 |
BusTalk A Community Discussing Buses and Bus Operations Worldwide!
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 27491 Location: NEW JOISEY
|
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2024 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
(SEE PREVIOUS POST)
"Many, many volumes were spoken"..............so much for "BUILT IN AMERICA", and "BUILT TO LAST"...............
"NYO"
["ST. LOUIS CAR COMPANY"]
["AMERICAN CAR & FOUNDRY"]
["PULLMAN-STANDARD"]
["BUDD"]
['PRESSED STEEL']
["CBTC=CHAOS BY THE CARLOAD"] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 27491 Location: NEW JOISEY
|
Posted: Fri Nov 29, 2024 12:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Not being from "Noo Yawk" myself, I'm wondering..........
1:
I know that on the "Es-Eye-Are" the old B&O CPL's have been replaced, so I am guessing the current signals (not at all that old) will also be replaced with "See-Bee-Tee-See", or, has the changeover already taken place?
2:
Anyone document how the "R-211's" (aka "The GRUMMANS of the subways") have performed on non-CBTC trackage with traditional block signals, vs operating on CBTC trackage?
Dang shame the "Are Toity-Too" Brightliners were not placed in reserve, to be able to lend assistance today.........
"NYO"
["BUDD"] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
W.B. Fishbowl
Age: 58 Joined: 02 Oct 2014 Posts: 3689 Location: New York, New York, USA
|
Posted: Fri Nov 29, 2024 4:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 wrote: | Not being from "Noo Yawk" myself, I'm wondering..........
1:
I know that on the "Es-Eye-Are" the old B&O CPL's have been replaced, so I am guessing the current signals (not at all that old) will also be replaced with "See-Bee-Tee-See", or, has the changeover already taken place?
2:
Anyone document how the "R-211's" (aka "The GRUMMANS of the subways") have performed on non-CBTC trackage with traditional block signals, vs operating on CBTC trackage?
Dang shame the "Are Toity-Too" Brightliners were not placed in reserve, to be able to lend assistance today.........
"NYO"
["BUDD"] |
As R-211T's are on the A line, I've not experienced the same "issues" riding those trains that I did on that one time I was on the new "Es-Eye-Are" car. But doesn't the A line have a combo at this point, or is that soon becoming all-"See-Bee-Tee-See"? The "Fordy-Sixes" are still around - for now. (As are the "Brighton Belles" on such lines as B, D and Q.) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 27491 Location: NEW JOISEY
|
Posted: Fri Nov 29, 2024 10:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
W.B.:
Thanks for the info.
Sad to say, but, as more and more lines go over to "See-Bee-Tee-See", rest assured, "signal issues" and "service disruptions" are. without a doubt, going to become more and more numerous and commonplace.
Just thinking about bygone rapid transit signalling......
Until 1967, PATH motormen who operated trains on the PRR/H&M/PATH "joint service" line to Newark until 1967, were also required to pass a PRR rulebook examination, as position light signals were still being utilized between Journal Square and Newark.
The PRR-owned "MP-52s" were equipped with cab signals, and, as such, had to be positioned at each end of a consist.
Too bad the "Brighton Belle" "R-68" concept of "low-tech" trains could not have continued; just thinking now of the "El-Eye-Double-Are"..........are there any of the venerable "M-3s" still running, or is all NTT "M-7s"/"9s"these days?
"NYO"
["M"] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
W.B. Fishbowl
Age: 58 Joined: 02 Oct 2014 Posts: 3689 Location: New York, New York, USA
|
Posted: Sun Dec 01, 2024 6:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
On the "El-Eye-Double-Are," it'd be all M-7/9 at this point; I've not seen a double side door on their cars in who knows how many years. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 27491 Location: NEW JOISEY
|
Posted: Sun Dec 01, 2024 7:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
W.B. Fishbowl wrote: | On the "El-Eye-Double-Are," it'd be all M-7/9 at this point; I've not seen a double side door on their cars in who knows how many years. |
Back in the late 1990s and early 2000s, when I would frequently hike out to Ronkonkama to spend a few days with my best pal (then retired) from "woik", I'd either be aboard an "Em-One" or an "Em-Three" (GREAT railfan window in the end doors!) out of Penn Station
I rode an M-7 once (eastbound), just after they began arriving; let it be said I much preferred one of the old tried-and-true "Metropolitans"........
"NYO"
["M"] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
W.B. Fishbowl
Age: 58 Joined: 02 Oct 2014 Posts: 3689 Location: New York, New York, USA
|
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2024 5:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 wrote: | I rode an M-7 once (eastbound), just after they began arriving; let it be said I much preferred one of the old tried-and-true "Metropolitans"........ |
I hears ya, I hears ya. You ain't gettin' any argument from me on that!
And Metro-North, with their equivalents . . . |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 27491 Location: NEW JOISEY
|
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2024 10:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
W.B.:
Back in the very early 1980s, I often used to hop on an ex-NYC 1950s MU for a short hop up to 125th Street, where I'd jump off and get a train heading back into GCT, before grabbing a Lex train downtown, just for the fun of it (all SMEES, back then!)
HATED that "Ronan" paint on those old NYC electrics(!!)
"NYO"
["5:25 WHITE PLAINS EXPRESS"] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 27491 Location: NEW JOISEY
|
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2024 9:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
W.B.:
As you are from "Noo Yawk", perhaps you can help out here..............
I've just viewed a series of outstanding photos on SubChat; quite a few were of the "East Side Access" facilities at Grand Central (I have not visited GCT since 2002)
Spectacular photos, but, I must admit, the new station and connecting corridors (IMHO) seem to hint at a bizarre melange of "Beneath The Planet Of The Apes" and "2001: A Space Odyessy"........too blank, bare, and sterile for my tastes (only the directional hints at the "olden days")
Question:
Photo caption of the curving passageway (that blank design just spooks me out) says that it was built within the curve of the old lower level loop (now, I DO know that the loop has been OOS for many years now.
Does any part of the loop still exist with tracks and related infrastructure, or has it all been obliterated?
I also know that there is a large food court in the old "Suburban Concourse" on the lower level; are any of the tracks/gates on this level still in revenue use today?
60-odd years ago, Your's Truly can still recall the growling, grumbling, and screeching of ancient "S" motors hauling empty NYC/NH consists around that loop, prior to taking the train back up to the long-vanished Mott Haven Yard for servicing......a lifetime ago.
Appreciate, as always, any info....I've been curious about this for some time now......
"NYO"
["5:20-BREWSTER LOCAL"] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 27491 Location: NEW JOISEY
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 27491 Location: NEW JOISEY
|
Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2024 11:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sighhhhhh.....
Just "loined" that the "See-Bee-Tee-See" currently in use of the Canarsie line ("L") which has been around for some time, is now in need of "tech refreshing"; this would, then, be the "second generation", in a sense, of "See-Bee-Tee-See" on this former "Bee-Em-Tee" line.
And look at how the old tried-and-true block signals did their duty so faithfully and reliable, decade after decade after decade......progress......you can have it.....it's all so much hype............
"NYO"
["LL"] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
W.B. Fishbowl
Age: 58 Joined: 02 Oct 2014 Posts: 3689 Location: New York, New York, USA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2024 1:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 wrote: | Sighhhhhh.....
Just "loined" that the "See-Bee-Tee-See" currently in use of the Canarsie line ("L") which has been around for some time, is now in need of "tech refreshing"; this would, then, be the "second generation", in a sense, of "See-Bee-Tee-See" on this former "Bee-Em-Tee" line.
And look at how the old tried-and-true block signals did their duty so faithfully and reliable, decade after decade after decade......progress......you can have it.....it's all so much hype............
"NYO"
["LL"] |
That's the other thing. I've heard of "planned obsolescence" with certain devices, but unfortunately that is a feature in anything that is computer-related. How many versions of certain operating systems have there been since the 1990's - V.101.5 or something like that? Not exactly a surprise that we're "loining" that that's the case with "See-Bee-Tee-See" as well. Unfortunately, there seems to be no-one at "Em-Tee-Yay" who has something resembling common sense - like, those in the '80's that had the R-62 and R-68 classes go "back to the basics" in terms of their machinery, after the "rolling iPads" of their day, the "Fordy-Fours" and "Fordy-Sixes" . . . it was said that common sense left the building once the likes of Richard Ravitch, Robert Kiley and David Gunn all left. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 27491 Location: NEW JOISEY
|
Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2024 2:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
W.B.:
Indeed, simple "common sense" left the the MTA when they were still at 370 Jay, in downtown Brooklyn
Think, now, of the level-headed "brass" that ruled the IRT and BMT when they were still "independent" companies; heck, look at how efficiently the "Eye-En-Dee" was originally run by the City, way back in the day.
Heck, even the "flamboyant" BMT didn't dabble in "futuristic" signalling!
PATH (the "tubes") is "hand-and-hand" with the "Em-Tee-Yay"........they've put ALL their "eggs" into the CBTC basket, with NO BACKUP system!!
Literally, in this case, it's all "down the 'tubes' ".........
"NYO"
["537 REP"] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
W.B. Fishbowl
Age: 58 Joined: 02 Oct 2014 Posts: 3689 Location: New York, New York, USA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2024 6:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 wrote: | W.B.:
Indeed, simple "common sense" left the the MTA when they were still at 370 Jay, in downtown Brooklyn
Think, now, of the level-headed "brass" that ruled the IRT and BMT when they were still "independent" companies; heck, look at how efficiently the "Eye-En-Dee" was originally run by the City, way back in the day.
Heck, even the "flamboyant" BMT didn't dabble in "futuristic" signalling!
PATH (the "tubes") is "hand-and-hand" with the "Em-Tee-Yay"........they've put ALL their "eggs" into the CBTC basket, with NO BACKUP system!!
Literally, in this case, it's all "down the 'tubes' ".........
"NYO"
["537 REP"] |
I'd've thought what was left of "common sense" left the "Em-Tee-Yay" after they moved out of 370 Jay into a new office building on Livingston Street, a few blocks away. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 27491 Location: NEW JOISEY
|
Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2024 7:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
W.B.:
You could be right, there.
BTW, over the weekend, I 'hoid" on 1010 WINS that 5th "Aven-oo" is supposed to be getting a HUGE "pedestrian friendly" makeover/upgrade over the next number of years, and traffic lanes will be reduced from five to three.
Now......let's how the "Em-Tee-Yay" deals with this, regarding the bus routes involved........
["M"] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You can attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|